On 5/20/2020 2:49 PM, James Cook via agora-business wrote: > On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 01:31, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >>> On May 19, 2020, at 21:27, nch wrote: >>> On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 8:07:27 PM CDT Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I vote REMAND. >>> >>> Why remand instead of remit? Alexis can't actually rejudge it right now. >>> >>> -- >>> nch >> >> That’s true, but I want to symbolically communicate my confidence in >> Alexis’s ability to judge the case. > > I vote REMAND for the same reason. >
Not that it's a big deal, but this seems like odd logic - Alexis has judged the case. Why not AFFIRM if you're respecting judgement ability? No new facts or arguments have been presented, so this is being overturned on wholly a matter of people's opinions differing from Alexis. REMAND is as much "your opinion is wrong" as a REMIT in that situation, right? -G.
