On Thursday, 14 May 2020, 19:28:38 GMT, James Cook via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 20:07, David Nicol via agora-discussion > <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > (1) judiciary thing: craft some immutables that allow contracts to specify > > Agora Nomic Arbitration Services as their venue of dispute resolution, > > possibly including stuff like all eligible contracts must be public and > > parties must pay a registration point (however those are to be obtained) to > > register such a thing with Agora. > > > > (2) police thing: legislate some crimes -- like "victim blaming in a tweet" > > -- that can reasonably be prosecuted on the internet only, and provide a > > framework for reporting, adjudicating, and shaming perpetrators (not a > > whole lot else Agora can do to them) until they submit Indulgence points > > (however those are to be obtained.) > > > > Thoughts? > > > A year ago, o mentioned e is part of a club with a charter heavily > based on Agora's ruleset. > > https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-discussion/2019-May/053904.html > (Or search your email for subject "Non-email public fora" posted May 23, > 2019.) > > I think PSS and Cuddle Beam express good concerns about Agora itself > more to outside events. Not to say that it wouldn't be interesting.
I think the best direction in this regard would be to allow CFJs that are not relevant to Agora directly, with some payment to compensate the judge for their time. "Agora as a ruleset interpretation service", if you like. So Agora would act entirely in a fact-finding role, not in any sort of enforcement role. (The person who commissioned Agora to come to a judgement could then do what they wanted with the resulting judgement and its reasoning.) One of the things I've been doing semi-recently is trying to apply nomic-style reasoning to the Laws of Contract Bridge, looking for scams and loopholes in them (not because I plan to exploit them, just out of curiosity and/or in an attempt to get them fixed in case somebody else tries to exploit them); they're written in a sufficiently legalistic way that that sort of analysis is possible. I imagine that there would be plenty of other "I'm curious about this"-style situations that might be worth paying the Agoran judicial system to sort out. -- ais523
