But "a player" is just one player, no? At least that's my understanding of
it.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 10:50 AM Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Sunday, March 1, 2020 10:46 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sun., Mar. 1, 2020, 17:05 Tanner Swett via agora-business, <
> > agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I submit a proposal with AI = 1, titled "Somebody gets a coin":
> > > {
> > > Enact a power-1 rule titled "A Coin Award":
> > > {
> > > When this rule is enacted, a player other than the
> > > author of the proposal which enacted this rule earns 1
> > > coin. Then, if a player earned a coin this way, this
> > > rule repeals itself.
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > According to Rule 217, "When interpreting and applying the rules, the
> > > text of the rules takes precedence", which presumably means that this
> > > rule does, in fact, award a player a coin.
> > >
> > > It would be awfully interesting to see whether or not this rule really
> > > does award a coin, and if so, who the coin is awarded to.
> > >
> > > —Warrigal
> > >
> >
> > I think I know what outcome I'll argue for, at least initially, but I
> want
> > to see if pass first.
> >
> > >
>
> I'm in the "one coin for each player except Warrigal" camp, personally...
>
> -twg
>
