I didn't perform an in-game action to grant consent, I just produced
external context via the which consent can be reasonably determined by.
On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 8:16 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> If it were IMPOSSIBLE for Cuddlebeam to consent to actions, I would argue
> that this didn’t work.
>
> Luckily, it isn’t. As far as I can tell, contracts can't make actions
> IMPOSSIBLE, only ILLEGAL. Therefore, the last clause of Cuddlebeam’s
> contract doesn’t work. It might still make those actions illegal, though.
> Let’s find out.
>
> I point my finger at Cuddlebeam for violating the last paragraph of
> 🧟✨Chattelbeam✨🧟: {
> While there is an Active Supermaster, Cuddlebeam cannot perform actions
> unless someone acts on their behalf to perform them.
> }
>
> Gaelan
>
> > On Mar 1, 2020, at 1:59 AM, Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hmmm, I guess No Fakery might be in play as well? I'm not sure.
> >
> > I'm fully in twg's hands right now and aside from asking them to take
> > measures to fulfill the contract as intended (I should've probably added
> > that as a clause to the pledge, noooow I understand why many contracts
> have
> > clauses like that), I assume full responsibility for what I did to
> myself -
> > although nothing stops me from grudge retaliating the best I can once I'm
> > free lol, if they try to weasel themselves out.
> >
> > Hrm. I can't consent to anything as an ACTION because I've locked myself
> > up. However I'm going to use point 3 of R2519 to produce "reasonably
> clear
> > context" and yell from outside the boundaries of Agora formality,
> > figuratively and literally.
> >
> > YO, TWG. I CONSENT TO YOU TAKING MEASURES TO FIX THE CONTRACT STUFF TO
> MAKE
> > IT MORE ACCORDING TO ITS INTENT. GO FOR IT. GREEN LIGHT. THUMBS UP. STAMP
> > OF APPROVAL. ALL YOURS, TIGER.
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 6:34 AM Gaelan Steele via agora-business <
> > agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >
> >> I CFJ: {
> >> If Cuddlebeam does not win the game in the next 90 days, there exists a
> >> combination of actions by players that would allow a player to levy the
> >> Cold Hand of Justice on twg for violation of the pledge below, without
> >> changing the rules or ratifying a document.
> >> }
> >>
> >> Arguments: {
> >> 2450/7 reads, in part: {
> >> If a Player makes a clear public pledge (syn. Oath) to perform (or
> refrain
> >> from performing) certain actions, then breaking the pledge within the
> >> pledge's time window is the Class N crime of Oathbreaking, where N is 2
> >> unless the pledge explicitly states otherwise. The time window of a
> pledge
> >> is 60 days, unless the pledge explicitly states otherwise. A pledge
> ceases
> >> to exist at the end of its time window.
> >> }
> >>
> >> I’m not sure if the quoted pledge “explicitly” states that its time
> window
> >> is 90 days. It certainly discusses a 90-day time window, but I’m not
> sure
> >> if that qualifies as “explicitly” stating that the pledge itself has a
> time
> >> window of 90 days.
> >>
> >> If the time window is 60 days, there’s no way to violate the pledge
> within
> >> its time window, and this is FALSE.
> >>
> >> If the time window is 90 days, it still might not work. When was the
> >> pledge violated? There’s an argument to be made that the violation
> occurs
> >> at the moment the 90-day window expires. If so, would that count as
> >> "breaking the pledge within the pledge's time window”?
> >> }
> >>
> >> Gaelan
> >>
> >>> On Feb 29, 2020, at 1:33 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business <
> >> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I cause myself to become CuddleBeam's Active Supermaster by pledging
> the
> >>> following:
> >>>
> >>> I Pledge that I will cause Cuddlebeam to Win Agora within 90 days. The
> >>> "N" of this Pledge, for the purpose of its Class N Crime of
> Oathbreaking
> >>> is a googleplex.
> >>>
> >>> -twg
> >>
> >>
>
>
