(Slightly deviating from the topic, but it appears first on r1728): any
reason why point 3 of this rule says "an integer multiple of 0.1 with a
minimum of 1"? Maybe I'm being super pedantic here, but integers don't
have anything after the decimal point, so why not just use number or
real number?
- DIS: Numbers and dependent actions sukil via agora-discussion
- Re: DIS: Numbers and dependent act... sukil via agora-discussion
- Re: DIS: Numbers and dependent act... AIS523--- via agora-discussion
- Re: DIS: Numbers and dependent... sukil via agora-discussion
- Re: DIS: Numbers and dependent... sukil via agora-discussion
- Re: DIS: Numbers and depen... James Cook via agora-discussion
- Re: DIS: Numbers and d... sukil via agora-discussion
- Re: DIS: Numbers ... Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
- Re: DIS: Numbers and d... Edward Murphy via agora-discussion
- Re: DIS: Numbers ... omd via agora-discussion
- Re: DIS: Numb... sukil via agora-discussion
- Re: DIS: ... Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
- Re: DIS: ... sukil via agora-discussion