On 2/22/2020 12:00 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote: > On Sat, 22 Feb 2020 at 14:44, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion > <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: >> In R2125/10 (power=3) there is the following: >>> A Regulated Action CAN only be performed as described by the >>> Rules, and only using the methods explicitly specified in the >>> Rules for performing the given action. >> >> Note that there's no "rules to the contrary notwithstanding" in here. >> Does this mean that power 3+ rules with numbers lower than 2125 would >> overrule this, and allow CANs without methods to work? Are there any CFJs >> on the subject - I can't remember any offhand. >> >> -G. > > I had to address this in my judgment on CFJ 3793. I found that it's > actually an interpretation provision, not a substantive requirement, > and therefore it does not directly interact with precedence (except on > other interpretation provisions).
Thanks!
