On 2/19/2020 9:33 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2/19/20 10:20 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
>> The below CFJ is 3810.  I assign it to Jason.
>>
>> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3810
>>
>> ===============================  CFJ 3810  ===============================
>>
>>       It is generally POSSIBLE to act on behalf of a zombie to transfer
>>       karma.
>>
>> ==========================================================================
> 
> 
> At [0], G. wrote:
> 
>> I think there was a court case that found that "publishing an X"
>> where X is a specific action that the principal CAN do in the rules by
>> publishing it (like a Notice of Honour or support/objection) was (in the
>> language of R2466) a "performing a specific action within a message" rather
>> than simply "sending a message".
>>
>> I remember disagreeing with the judgement but then we added that specific
>> zombie-limitation to R2532 when we did a big negotiated zombie nerf.
>> (unfortunately I think the CFJ happened in the database gap between CFJs
>> 3585 and 3634, maybe someone else remembers more precisely...).
> 
> 
> If such a CFJ actually exists, I think the one I'm assigned would be
> very easily determined from it. I glanced at all of the Court Gazettes
> in the time period within the 3585-3634 gap, and didn't seem anything
> that looks relevant, and I also searched the H. Arbitor's archive on
> GitHub for the words "publish" and "publishing", and, after glancing at
> all of the results, I was unable to find such a CFJ.
> 
> Does anybody have any idea which CFJ G. might be referring to?
> 
> 
> [0]:
> https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-discussion/2019-September/055503.html
> 

My apologies for not following up to that message.  I did a fairly
thorough search myself after I wrote that - I remember a discussion and
some level of consensus but I couldn't find an actual CFJ.  Aris, does
this ring any bells, I vaguely remember you saying something similar to
your gratuitous arguments for this case, which is what convinced me at the
time, but that could be a completely faulty memory along with the phantom cfj.

-G.

Reply via email to