On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 9:41 PM Tanner Swett via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:06 AM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion > <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > [...] > > > On Jan 23, 2020, at 8:36 PM, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion > > > <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > Of course, "TCC" stands for "the TCC Corporation." > > > > Shouldn’t this be TTC, then? (As a bonus, that means it doesn’t have to > > share room in my acronym namespace with the Tacoma Community College.) > > Are you telling me that "TCC" doesn't start with "C"? You may be right > about that... > > Thanks to everyone for their feedback. I may post a new proto this weekend. > > By the way, it's starting to seem awfully inconvenient that any > contract must have at least two people on whose behalf the contract > can effectively act. It's also inconvenient that a contract can't > allow non-parties to take assets from it. Oh well; that can all be > worked around.
Not true anymore! Contract Patency v3 passed. Contracts can now get by with only 1 member. Additionally, my earlier about acting on behalf is also dealt with by a new explicitness requirement. Do you think you might have a new proto out soon? -Aris
