On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 05:36, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > * 4 points for each switch defined by the rule and tracked by the office
You might want to say "type of switch" to make it clear this doesn't count each instance. Maybe it would be better just to say "X points if the rule defines at least one switch tracked by the office". > The holder of each office for which that rule has affinity is said to be one > of that rule’s secondary bureaucrats, unless e is that rule’s primary > bureaucrat. "has positive affinity"? Otherwise, as written: 'Each rule is said to have an “affinity” for each office'. > If a person is the primary bureaucrat for any rule amended or repealed by a > proposal, eir voting strength is increased by 2 for Agoran decisions to adopt > that proposal. What if a proposal amends a rule more than once? Does this trigger each time? That would lead to a scam where an officer could force through any proposal that amends one of eir rules enough times. - Falsifian
