On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 9:37 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > Thanks for the very informative message! Out of curiosity, is there any > reason From munging needs to be off for non-Gmail hosts, specifically > Fastmail (who probably shows up in your log as messagingengine.com)? I saw > you mention that they bounced messages from the EC2 server, but it’s unclear > if any of the original issues apply.
Do you mean 'needs to be on'? To clarify, 'From munging' in this case means changing the From header to the list address, and it should currently be on for everyone, since I enabled it using an existing Mailman option ('from_is_list') which isn't recipient-specific. Indeed, problems delivering to non-Gmail servers seem to be limited to ec2.qoid.us, probably because the IP address didn't get a chance to build up a reputation; I don't see any similar rejections in vps.qoid.us's logs. Thus it probably would have sufficed to enable >From munging only for Gmail recipients. However, I didn't bother writing the few lines of code necessary for that, since this is meant to be a temporary measure anyway. :) Also, the IP was listed on backscatterer.org, which I was concerned other servers might take into account, even if none apparently saw fit to reject list mail because of it. ("Was" listed, because I just checked backscatterer.org again, and the entry has expired already! That's nice. But I'll give Gmail more time.) Incidentally, I wonder why vps.qoid.us didn't get similar failures when I first started running the list. Perhaps it did, but nobody noticed at the time. Perhaps anti-spam systems have gotten more trigger-happy since then. One factor might be that ec2.qoid.us, as the name suggests, is hosted on EC2, and that IP block might be treated as more suspicious – although I believe the individual IP has been assigned to me for some time, and I hadn't previously used it for mail. ...Also, I just realized that when switching to the 'notqmail' fork of qmail, I dropped the qmail-verify patch, meaning that I unknowingly broke backscatter protection hours after enabling it. Getting off backscatterer.org was mere luck! As of right now, verification is really, truly on. I should probably switch to a modern mail server rather than juggling qmail patches – but I'm unenthusiastic about the risk of breaking things yet again.