On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 5:17 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > So, starting with a trivial case, I think it’s pretty clear that a player > registering does not constitute a “change in the ruleset,” even though it > affects the functioning of rules with regard to that person. My goal was word > the rule such that it under the same case. However, an argument could be made > that the change here is somehow more “fundamental” because it affects the > relationship between rules themselves, and therefore is a rule change.
I'd tend to agree that changing That One Rule would not be a "change to the ruleset". Though I think the original definition of That One Rule is slightly better, because it avoids a gamestate "change" entirely, in favor of something that's more of a change in real-world state (the act of announcing that something is The One).
