On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 at 03:46, AIS523--- via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On Sat, 2019-12-28 at 18:48 -0800, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion > wrote: > > So, just to be clear here, we’re going to ratify the claim that a-o > > and a-b stopped being public fora at the start time and resumed being > > public fora at the end time? I’m good with that. > > Ørjan's issue is that e believes a single ratification can't make > retroactive changes at two different points in past time. So you'd > either need two ratifications to do that, or else one ratification > followed by making a-o and a-b public via the mechanism in rule 478.
If ratification doesn't do everything we want, can't we just directly write into the proposal how the gamestate should be modified? E.g. "Change the gamestate, to what it would be if a-b and a-o's publicity had been switched to Discussion at time X and then switched back to Public at time Y". We did this after I discovered that dependent actions were broken: see proposal 8164 https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2019-February/012800.html There was a potential issue with rule changes, but I don't think there were any rule changes during the period in question here. -- - Falsifian
