On 10/27/2019 10:48 PM, omd wrote:
I'm keeping this proposal around as well because the other one may not
pass. However, I'm not convinced that "unobfuscated" is different
enough from "clear" to make a difference. I'll think about the
wording some more.
After a scam last year, criteria for dependent action intents were changed
from:
unambiguously and clearly specifying the action
to:
unambiguously, clearly, conspicuously, and without obfuscation
specified the action
the "without obfuscation" was specifically seen as different than "clear" or
"unambiguous", meaning generally "without conscious effort to hide" or
something like that.
(e.g. what Aris did this time was perfectly clear and unambiguous once you
found it, but it was hidden/obfuscated by being in an odd place in the
distribution).
-G.
