On Sunday, October 20, 2019 9:15 PM, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk 
<ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote:
> I object. Can't you CFJ this, like people normally do with ambiguous
> registrations, rather than simply trying to disregard the issue
> entirely?

Oh, I wasn't even thinking of your "proposal" as a potentially ambiguous 
registration, I was thinking along the lines of "what if e has a document 
saying e's a player set to ratify in the near future as correct within the last 
week or so". Not that that would have been particularly damaging anyway.

(Actually, I was mostly thinking "e's probably just playing mind games, but 
what the hell, I'll play along".)

-twg

Reply via email to