A more general comment on both this and Murphy's proposal - maybe, if we're
in the mood to embark on a handful of minigames, we should create a new
office with the up-front understanding that the particular office should be
assigned tracking of the various minigames, so anyone holding the office
would be effectively consenting to deal with minigame switches.
Basically The Fat Director, but with a proactive scope of "game-tracking".
(If we introduce a bunch at once, maybe we should actually score them so you
need to win 3 minigames to win the game or something, so we don't have to
worry about whether each one causes too many wins).
-G.
On 10/20/2019 2:40 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
Bleh.
I note that holding a potentially-infinite number of offices would be an
amusing punishment for lazy rule-writing, but conclude that it’s a little
harsh. I retract my proposal and submit the following one:
{
Title: Clean up your own mess, without making a bigger one
AI: 1
Co-authors: Jason Cobb
Remove the following paragraph from Rule 2139 “The Registrar”: {
The Registrar is also responsible for tracking any switches,
defined in a rule, that would otherwise lack an officer to track
them, unless the switch is defined as untracked.
}
Create a power-1 rule titled “Switch Responsibility” with the following text: {
For each switch which would otherwise lack an officer to track it, and is not
defined as untracked, there exists an imposed office named “Tracker of [switch
name]” that is responsible for tracking that switch.
}
[1006/44 states:
When a proposal takes effect and creates a new office, if the
proposal does not specify otherwise, the author of that proposal
becomes the holder of the office.
I think this works, but we might need to clarify the meaning of “creates a new
office” to be sure.]
}
On Oct 20, 2019, at 2:30 PM, Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/20/19 5:21 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
Create a power-1 rule titled “Switch Responsibility” with the following text: {
For each switch which would otherwise lack an officer to track it, and is not
defined as untracked, there exists an imposed office named “Tracker of [switch
name]” that is responsible for tracking that switch.
}
I get the intent, but would this create an office per type of switch or per
instance of a switch?
--
Jason Cobb
