> "The CFJ becomes unassigned" is covered in R991 as synonymous with being > Recused, so it wasn't needed (I think?): > ... > > Fine on putting the SHOULD back, hopefully that's not a deal-killer in terms > of voting for this one... (in the few self-recusals I've seen in the past > few months I don't think anyone suggested a different judge, so it wasn't > being paid attention to particularly). > > -G.
Oops, you're right, sounds good. I don't have an opinion on SHOULD right now. -- - Falsifian
