Oh, I missed the R991 part.
I was looking at this in R2492:
When a judge recuses emself from a CFJ, then
* the CFJ becomes unassigned;
If the R991 text didn't exist, then R2492 would define
what "recuse" means, but it's specific recusing oneself
whereas here in R591 what's used is "remove":
the
Arbitor CAN remove em from being the judge of that case by
announcement
I was actually fairly certain that "Recuse" was a synonym for
"remove from case" based on common usage anyway, I was just being over-
cautious.
Anyhow, there's definitely room to condense some text between
the 3 rules, working on it...
On 7/17/2019 3:45 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
Why so?
Rule 991 ("Calls for Judgement"):
To "remove" or "recuse" a person from a being the judge of a CFJ is to
flip that CFJ's judge from that person to unassigned.
(although it looks like there's a typo in there)
Jason Cobb
On 7/17/19 6:40 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Hmm, the term "recuse" looks like it only applies to self-removal
(something to fix).