Hmm... maybe the statement should have been "The time window of [the pledge] is 60 days."
On Fri, Jul 5, 2019, 5:16 PM Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Gratuitous: > > Let's say it's Day 31 and R. Lee has kept eir pledge so far. The answer > to the question "did R. Lee [perform the correct behavior] for least 30 > days > [from the time of the pledge]?" would be TRUE regardless of what happens > after that. > > Whether (after the 30 days) the pledge is technically "in its time window > but IMPOSSIBLE to break" versus being "out of its time window" (and how > that > relates to the term "operates" in the CFJ statement) is a matter of > semantics that is IRRELEVANT. > > On 7/5/2019 10:42 AM, Jason Cobb wrote: > > I CFJ: "R. Lee's Oath to vote against certain proposals operates for 60 > days." > > > > Evidence: > > > > Excerpt from Rule 2450: > > > > If a Player makes a clear public pledge (syn. Oath) to perform > > (or refrain from performing) certain actions, then breaking the > > pledge within the pledge's time window is the Class N crime of > > Oathbreaking, where N is 2 unless the pledge explicitly states > > otherwise. The time window of a pledge is 60 days, unless the > > pledge explicitly states otherwise. > > > > R. Lee's Oath: > > > > I hereby swear an Oath to vote AGAINST any proposal that adds > > more text than it deletes for at least the next 30 days. > > > > Arguments: > > > > The Oath does not clearly identify and provide intent for the Oath > > to operate for a certain time window, it instead says "for at least > > the next 30 days". The "at least" arguably prevents the "30 days" > > from being definite, thus the pledge does not explicitly state that > > it operates for any specific time period. Thus, under Rule 2450, it > > should operate for 60 days - this CFJ should be judged TRUE. > > > > > > Jason Cobb > > > > On 6/19/19 11:15 PM, Rebecca wrote: > >> I hereby swear an Oath to vote AGAINST any proposal that adds more text > >> than it deletes for at least the next 30 days. >
