I'm favoring this one... and I can't think of a past adjudication off the
top of my head.
On 6/27/2019 8:05 AM, Jason Cobb wrote:
I pledge, for the _previous_ 24 hours, not to make any pledges.
I point my finger at Jason Cobb for the crime of Oathbreaking, and I throw
myself upon the mercy of the court.
CFJ: "Jason Cobb is guilty of the crime of Oathbreaking for the pledge that
was made in this message."
[Apologies if this has been adjudicated before.]
[I request that the Arbitor include my previous message and this message
above the CFJ in Caller's Evidence.]
More evidence:
Rule 2405:
If a Player makes a clear public pledge (syn. Oath) to perform (or
refrain from performing) certain actions, then breaking the pledge
within the pledge's time window is the Class N crime of
Oathbreaking, where N is 2 unless the pledge explicitly states
otherwise. The time window of a pledge is 60 days, unless the pledge
explicitly states otherwise.
Arguments:
There's nothing in Rule 2405 that explicitly says a pledge can't
operate retroactively. Other than that, I have basically no idea
what the result of this should be.
Jason Cobb
On 6/27/19 10:59 AM, Jason Cobb wrote:
I pledge, for the next 5 seconds, not to make any Oaths.
