So, what about the ones where you both supported and objected (like
X=2.1)? Are you both a Supporter and Objector, because I don't see
anything in the dependent action rules that says you can't do both?
Jason Cobb
On 6/25/19 11:49 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
For each number X that is an integral multiple of 0.1 not less than
1.0 and
not exceeding 5.0:
{
If X times 10 is a composite number, I object to all intents to banish
the Ritual with X Agoran Consent.
If X times 10 is a member of the Fibonacci Sequence, I support all
intents to banish the Ritual with X Agoran Consent.
}
On 6/24/2019 11:17 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
For each number X that is an integral multiple of 0.1 not less than
1.0 and not exceeding 5.0, I do the following:
{
I declare intent, with X Agoran Consent, to banish The Ritual,
pursuant to Rule 2596 ("The Ritual").
I engage in DIABOLICAL LAUGHTER about the intent created in the
previous sentence.
}
Is this legal? At least one of them will work at whatever time I end
up doing it, right?
