I see your point, but I think the phrasing accomplishes the same thing. It says "When this Rule is triggered, the following events happen in order". That makes it pretty clear that the rule is the agent, doesn't it?
-Aris On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 9:00 PM omd <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 8:23 PM Aris Merchant > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I intend with Agoran Consent to trigger Rule 2598, "Side-Game Suspension". > > > > For the public reference, the relevant provision of that rule is as follows: > > "Any player CAN with Agoran Consent trigger this Rule. When this Rule > > is triggered, the following events happen in order: (a) the Politics > > Rules are automatically repealed in ascending numerical order (unless > > Politics has been Revived), (b) the Spaaace Rules are automatically > > repealed in ascending numerical order (unless Spaaace has been > > Revived), and (c) this Rule is automatically repealed." > > I object, because I think the rule may be broken due to not specifying > who is performing the rule changes, i.e. "this rule repeals rule X" > rather than "rule X is repealed".
