Oh wow. That’s funny. I didn’t even notice that that was for a prior year election. Lol.
This made me notice another big problem. There is an ongoing “election” under Rule 2154, and I don’t think there’s any way to terminate it! Here’s why: Several weeks ago, an “election” for PM was “initiated” under Rule 2154. The ADOP opened a nomination period, and i think G. and Aris both announced eir candidacies? Under R2154, “In a timely fashion after the nomination period ends, the ADoP CAN and SHALL” initiate an Agoran decision to resolve that PM “election.” The ADOP made two attempts to do that, but under R107 those attempts "invalid" because they failed to identify Aris as a valid option. I then tried to distribute the Agoran decision as Deputy ADOP, but that didn’t work because more than 1 week has passed since the close of the nomination period! R2154 clearly says that the ADOP “CAN” initiate the Agoran decision only “in a timely fashion after the nomination period ends.” And my attempt was more than 1 week after the nomination period, so i could not initiate the decision as deputy ADOP at that time! If that’s true, then there’s no way to initiate an Agoran decision on the PM election and there’s no other way to terminate that election! What a mess! > On Jun 12, 2019, at 11:10 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote: > > > It's trivially TRUE in the context of the ~July 6 election (and based on > how the CFJ is worded, that's enough for a trivial TRUE without addressing > the current election, that twg was intending to address). > > BUT, in terms of the matter twg was trying to get at, Corona gave consent in > the context of a previous election. Personally, if I consent to be > installed into office during the course of a particular election, I wouldn't > think I'd be consenting to every future election! (and if it's construed > that I did consent for all future elections, it sure wasn't with my > informed wilful consent!) > >> On 6/12/2019 7:23 AM, D. Margaux wrote: >> Gratuitous arguement: Seems to be TRUE to me. Corona subsequently >> became a zombie, but I see no rules that would retract a player's >> consent to holding office upon becoming a zombie, nor are there any >> prohibitions against zombies being elected to offices. Not sure what >> I'm missing, but seems straight forward to me. >>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 1:16 AM Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote: >>> >>> >>> The below CFJ is 3732, I assign it to Murphy. >>> >>> =============================== CFJ 3732 =============================== >>> >>> In the message quoted below, Corona gave eir 'explicit or >>> reasonably implied consent', as required by Rule 1006, to be made >>> the holder of Prime Minister. >>> >>> ========================================================================== >>> >>> Caller: twg >>> >>> Judge: Murphy >>> >>> ========================================================================== >>> >>> History: >>> >>> Called by twg: 02 Jun 2019 14:59:08 >>> Assigned to Murphy: (as of this message) >>> >>> ========================================================================== >>> >>> Caller's Evidence: >>> >>> On Friday, July 6, 2018 10:58 AM, Corona wrote: >>> >>> > I become a candidate for Prime Minister. >>> > >>> > Platform: Not being the other guy, who currently supports unpopular and >>> > somewhat misguided reforms. >>> > >>> > ~Corona >>> >>> ========================================================================== >>>
