Sorry - I should add! I see no reason not to assign the currently-favored cases as indicated within the next 24 hours (to D. Margaux, G., and V.J. Rada) - was just giving it a little longer before performing substantive actions (especially with ID numbering), in case I missed something.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 3:09 PM D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 11, 2019, at 3:52 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote: > > > > Jun 4, 1:09 PM > > - Arbitor attempts to assign #3730 to a case with text "If no player > > activates Rule 2596...", and assign it to D. Margaux, but the case was > > 'called' by V.J. Rada in Discussion so didn't exist. > > - V.J. Rada (Jun 5, 5:50 PM) calls a CFJ with the same text. > > - D. Margaux favored the pseudo-CFJ, so assuming favoring is still good. > > - ACTION NEEDED: ID NUMBER AND JUDGE ASSIGNMENT > > I intend without 3 objections to assign this CFJ to myself.
