Wow. Thank you all for the quick replies. I really was not expecting it that quickly.
That all makes sense, thank you. Jason Cobb On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 9:14 PM ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk < ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote: > On Sat, 2019-06-01 at 18:09 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote: > > Was that really a deliberate perk? It seems incredibly trivial, as > > perks go. I was under the impression the old rule was repealed as > > part of a simplification effort; lots of stuff was being repealed > > around then. > > I think it was an accidental perk, i.e. because there were plenty of > other perks around at the time, creating a new one didn't seem like a > problem (although the simplification effort was the actual reason, not > the perk in of itself). > > -- > ais523 > >
