Well, in order for a cleaning to be valid, it must be a "correction". If there is nothing to correct, then the cleaning can nowise be effective. Rule 2429 ("Bleach") states that "[r]eplacing a non-zero amount of whitespace with a different non-zero amount of whitespace is generally _insignificant_, except for paragraph breaks." This seems to disqualify spacing issues as corrections, as they are "insignificant."

On 5/22/19 11:20 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
I’m relying more heavily on rule 2221 (“Cleanliness”) for mechanism. It 
provides:

Any player CAN clean a rule without objection by specifying one or more 
corrections to spelling, grammar, capitalization, formatting, and/or dialect, 
or to whether a synonym or abbreviation is used in place of a word or phrase, 
in the rule's text and/or title; the rule is amended by this rule as specified 
by that person.

I’ll admit that respecifying the entire rule is not the _ideal_ way of 
specitying “one or more corrections to … formatting,” but it appears to meet 
all the other elements of this rule as I understand it, and my message is 
intended to meet the form requirements for a dependent action (in this case 
“[cleaning] a rule without objection”).

I’m only relying on rule 2429 for policy, not mechanism. I agree with your 
interpretation of how it otherwise applies in isolation.

What have I missed?

-o

On May 23, 2019, at 1:14 AM, Reuben Staley <[email protected]> wrote:

You are mistaken as to how the Bleach rule works. It does not mean any player 
can change the spacing by way of cleaning, it means that I can format rules 
using whatever spacing I want, as long as I respect paragraph breaks.

If the Bleach rule did work that way, then every rule would be wrapped several 
different ways because it seems everyone submits proposals using different 
wrapping standards. All I generally do is wrap the ruleset to 72 characters.

This mistake is understandable, however. For future reference, what you can do 
instead of attempt a cleaning is inform me that I have messed up the spacing 
somewhere and I will remedy it in the next draft.


--
Trigon

Reply via email to