On 5/20/2019 1:16 PM, James Cook wrote:
On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 12:08, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote:
I vote AGAINST 8177.
I act on behalf of Telnaior to vote AGAINST 8177.
As commented earlier, I was knocked out of space early on, as have
others. Willing to sit out of a subgame this long, but not through
a whole revival.
Separate question: why does this make 8177 bad? The proposal allows
the game to be continued fairly easily (I feel like the main obstacle
remains finding an Astronomor). If the state is reset, that's better
for players who didn't get to play the first time around. I feel like
I'm missing something.
I was against this if it was *not* assumed to be reset. (players who
register while space is on hiatus would not get new spaceships created when
it re-activates).
If we go the ratification route (which is fine), we'd have to re-create all
the spaceships on the other side (because that's not a matter of default
switches, those are assets that would need to be re-made).
