> - "Automatic rules repeals" are a little dangerous because > if there's uncertainty as to the conditions the ruleset may change > automagically without visible trace. It's generally better to tie ruleset > changes to a required statement of change that can be hunted up in > the lists, and even better practice if there's a bit of a warning in > case someone wants to point out an error in the permitting conditions, > e.g.: > > "[When both systems have been revived], any player can cause this rule > to repeal itself with Notice".
I think the second-last paragraph of Rule 105 requires the warning period. It also says the "full text" of any rule change must be published. I guess for a repeal of a rule that means some text explicitly saying the rule is repealed must be published.
