What about just requiring Agoran Consent? Seems like the obvious way to protect something that could be useful or dangerous depending on who's using it.
-twg -------- Original Message -------- On 25 Feb 2019, 01:08, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > It seems to me that this would cause a heap of complications in writing > proposals, which would need to include safeguards against disastrous > partial applications. For example, a proposal that splits an important > rule into two parts, by amending the original and creating a new one, > could easily be vetoed to cancel the creation part. > > Alternatively, voters could make votes conditional on whether there is a > veto or not. > > On the other hand, I can imagine occasional useful vetoes to cancel bugs > and the like. > > In sum, this proposal can't cause real trouble if proposal writers > or voters are really careful, but that may be a tall assumption. > > Greetings, > Ørjan. > > On Sun, 24 Feb [2019](tel:2019), Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> I submit the following proposal, line-item veto 2, AI-1: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Enact a Rule, "Line-item Veto", with the following text: >> >> The Comptrollor is an imposed office. When the office is vacant, >> the ADoP CAN, by announcement, set the Comptroller to a player >> chosen at random from the set of current Officers, excepting any >> player who was most recently the Comptrollor. The ADoP SHALL do >> so in a timely fashion after the office becomes vacant. >> >> When the Comptrollor office has been held for the same player for >> 30 days, it becomes vacant. >> >> A Notice of Veto is a body of text, published by the Comptrollor, >> clearly, directly, and without obfuscation labelled within the >> publishing message as being a Notice of Veto. >> >> When a Comptrollor publishes a Notice of Veto, the office of >> Comptrollor becomes vacant. >> >> If the text of a Notice of Veto clearly indicates certain >> provisions within specified Proposals as being vetoed, and the >> voting period for a decision to adopt the proposal is ongoing >> when the Notice is published, then the provision is vetoed. >> For the purposes of this Rule, each individual change specified >> within a proposal's text is a "provision". >> >> Vetoed provisions in a proposal CANNOT be applied when that >> proposal takes effect. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>
