> On Feb 24, 2019, at 11:15 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote: > > Can you give me any example of a pair where R1030 would block deference from > a high power to a low power from working? The problem I'm having is that > your reading prevents R1030 from working at all by defining R1030 > "deference" as something that never happens. None come to mind. But I also can’t think of a meaning of “conflict” that would apply to two rules that expressly accommodate one another.
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! D. Margaux
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! D. Margaux
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! James Cook
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! Ørjan Johansen
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! D. Margaux
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! D. Margaux
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! D. Margaux
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! D. Margaux
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! D. Margaux
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! Gaelan Steele
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! Ørjan Johansen
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! D. Margaux
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! Ørjan Johansen