> That doesn’t mean pure logic is unimportant; but it does mean that logic “works” only to the extent it can persuade the relevant legal actors.
I agree with that entirely. Perspectivism and shit. It's why we have CFJs and stuff, people disagree all the time. On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 7:50 PM D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Feb 22, 2019, at 1:45 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote: > > > > Given that, unlike countries, Agora is an > > entirely voluntary organization, my personal worry about Agora is not > > a "full ossification that almost everyone agrees happened" nor "1 or 2 > > people saying we were playing wrong" but a situation where two > > similarly-sized camps disagree with an aspect, and end up trying to > > run two entirely separate games (separate reports, etc.) on the same > > list while arguing that theirs is the One True Way. > > Wow! This actually sounds kind of fun. It’s like a nomic civil war! > > Not saying that we should actually try to have that happen though...
