No, I disagree. The point is that quang was a definition in the Agoran
dialect, the same as if the relevant verb had been defined in standard
English (we’ve never made a specific ruling on linguistic acceptability,
beyond the comprehension of the players). Here, you’re just saying
something and expecting someone to go look it up, without providing a
specific definition. Quang worked because all or most of the players
“already” knew.

-Aris

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 11:48 AM Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote:

>
> This is a clear and direct application of Judge Murphy's interpretation of
> the Rewards Rule.  If "quang" is allowed to reference a random cultural
> definition, I don't see why referencing something that is directly
> contained
> in the ruleset ("whatever is necessary to claim a reward") would fail when
> we allow this sort of unofficial jargon to succeed.
>
> In case your CoE denial succeded:
>
> CoE:  The latest Treasuror's Report is missing an appropriately-claimed
> reward for my most recent Herald's Report.
>
>
> On 2/18/2019 11:41 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> > You mean this?
> >
> > On Monday, February 18, 2019 7:03 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote:
> >> On 2/17/2019 1:34 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >>
> >>> Herald’s Weekly report
> >>> Date of Last Report: 04 Feb 2018
> >>> Date of This Report: 17 Feb 2019
> >>
> >> I state what is necessary to be Rewarded for the above-referenced
> report.
> >
> > I did miss that, yes, but even now I see it I'm not at all clear that it
> works - seems to be a case of ISIDTID.
> >
> > For comparison, I state whatever is necessary to publish a revision to
> the below-referenced report.
> >
> > -twg
> >
> >
> > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> > On Monday, February 18, 2019 7:17 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> CoE: missing my most recent claim of reward for the herald's report
> >> (crossed in the mail?)
> >>
> >> On 2/18/2019 11:13 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> >>
> >>> Date of this weekly report: 2019-02-18
> >>> Date of last weekly report: 2019-01-29
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to