Re: DIS: Re: BUS: it's time to care again

[D. Margaux]

> On Feb 17, 2019, at 3:37 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote:
> 
> Gaelan had to specifically ask me to remove my
> standard intent boilerplate, otherwise eir scam would have been trivially
> stopped

But Gaelan’s scam did identify a dangerous flaw in the intent rules. Would you 
have noticed it and objected in time if, instead, e had intended without 
objection to ratify a document that, e.g., gave everyone 50 blots?