No worries - if it's missing it just points to another little gap to fill.
On 2/17/2019 12:12 PM, D. Margaux wrote:>> On Feb 17, 2019, at 3:03 PM,
Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote:>>>> We used to have a "the judge SHALL NOT
knowingly assign an inappropriate>> judgement" (which is one reason
"appropriate" is in all the judgement>> choices). Looks like we lost that
somewhere along the line? Or am I missing it.> > I didn’t see anything like
that either. If I did break a rule, I won’t declare
a paradox victory. I regret my last cheating victory, and don’t want to
reprise it.
