> On Feb 15, 2019, at 10:04 AM, James Cook <jc...@cs.berkeley.edu> wrote: > > 1. The action is to be performed Without N Objections, there are > at least N Objectors to that intent. This needs an “and,” but otherwise looks good to me!
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! James Cook
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! Madeline
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! Ørjan Johansen
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! Madeline
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fa... Ørjan Johansen
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! James Cook
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! James Cook
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! D. Margaux
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! James Cook
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fa... D. Margaux
- DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! James Cook
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
- DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! Aris Merchant
- DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! D. Margaux
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! Timon Walshe-Grey
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! James Cook
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast! Timon Walshe-Grey
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fa... James Cook