Thank you for including me—I do appreciate that gesture. :-) It was actually twg’s first contract that led me to inspect the relevant contract provisions more closely, and caused me to find the loophole. So I do think it’s only fair that twg get full 100% credit for this loophole, and I wouldn’t want any votes to be split between us.
> On Feb 14, 2019, at 2:35 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote: > > Sure! I considered it fair game because you "pointed it out" to me > privately around the same time that twg published eir first contract > (but e didn't "point it out" at that time so your thoughts were > original). But I'm happy to respect that. > >> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 11:23 AM D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> H. Herald: I ask that my entry be withdrawn, because it’s in essence >> duplicative of twg’s which came first. >> >>> On Feb 14, 2019, at 2:13 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote: >>> >>> Didn't notice that was meant as a specific entry as opposed to >>> follow-on conversation! The brief was "most interesting or fun >>> Rules loophole or unexpected Rules interaction" and this is definitely >>> an interesting and unexpected Rules interaction (and while it didn't >>> turn out to be dangerous, the result pointed out things like 'destroy >>> all contracts' that would be unexpectedly dangerous). Profit or scam >>> not necessary. And now I also notice that I said "whomever points >>> out" so you don't have to "officially enter" beyond pointing something >>> out. >>> >>> So I'll add that one. >>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 11:00 AM Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Damn, I thought my Agora = Contract thing would count but it's true that it >>>> doesn't really *scam* anything, it's just a perspective shift on the >>>> Ruleset. >>>> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 7:28 PM Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Read the Ruleset Week Contest - update >>>>> >>>>> Before I give opinions or try to start a process to determine the >>>>> winner, here's a list of all the entries I saw (Telnaior, Gaelan, >>>>> CuddleBeam, twg, D. Margaux). Did I miss anyone? >>>>> >>>>> Telnaior illustrating that contracts can make infinitely-rewarding >>>>> reports: >>>>> >>>>> https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2019-February/039875.html >>>>> >>>>> Gaelan's attempt to win by Apathy, by using two messages for the same >>>>> intent: >>>>> >>>>> https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2019-February/039934.html >>>>> >>>>> CuddleBeam pointing out that space wins are infinite: >>>>> >>>>> https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2019-February/039895.html >>>>> >>>>> twg attempt to use contracts to induct the unwilling: >>>>> >>>>> https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2019-February/039950.html >>>>> >>>>> D. Margaux working on the same thing: >>>>> >>>>> https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2019-February/039896.html >>>>> (and when twg scooped em, followed up with a different approach): >>>>> >>>>> https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2019-February/039953.html >>>>>
