To re-iterate a note I made at the start of all that noise: I recognize we might not be in agreement about how Rule 2124 is supposed to work, but I at least want the current version of my proposal to reflect my own thinking clearly.
On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 18:36, James Cook <jc...@cs.berkeley.edu> wrote: > > Sorry for all the versions. > > I withdraw my previous proposal (Correction to Agoran Satisfaction, > Version 1.1.2) and submit a proposal as follows, and comment that I > removed the word "and" between #2 and #3 and turned the items into > sentences. > > Title: Correction to Agoran Satisfaction, Version 1.1.3 > Adoption Index: 2 > Text: > Replace the following part of of Rule 2124: > > Agora is Satisfied with an intent to perform a specific action if > and only if: > > 1. if the action is to be performed Without N Objections, then it > has fewer than N objectors; > > 2. if the action is to be performed With N support, then it has > N or more supporters; and > > 3. if the action is to be performed with N Agoran Consent, then > the ratio of supporters to objectors is greater than N, or the > action has at least one supporter and no objectors. > > 4. if the action is to be performed With Notice or With T Notice. > > with this: > > Agora is Satisfied with an intent to perform a specific action > unless at least one of the following is true: > > 1. The action is to be performed Without N Objections, and it has > at least N objectors. > > 2. The action is to be performed With N support, and it has fewer > than N supporters. > > 3. The action is to be performed with N Agoran Consent, and > the ratio of supporters to objectors is no more than N, and the > action has no supporters or at least one objector.
