Votes (and no intents to win by apathy this time) inline. Gaelan
> On Feb 9, 2019, at 4:04 PM, Aris Merchant
> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
> quorum is 3, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid
> options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are
> conditional votes).
>
> ID Author(s) AI Title
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 8152 G. 2.0 Justice Reenactment
FOR
> 8153 D Margaux 1.0 Favour Loophole Closure
FOR, but it might be a good idea to reword it to just CAN and SHALL for each
individual case—this proposal results in something a bit awkward
> 8154 CuddleBeam 1.0 [Seductive yodeling noises]
FOR (but note, CB, you don’t need the double conditional—IIRC dependent actions
have to be POSSIBLE when resolved)
> 8155 twg, Telnaior 1.0 Spaaace Loophole #493
FOR
> 8156 Trigon 3.0 version ∞
PRESENT—doesn’t seem terribly necessary
> 8157 Trigon 1.0 No one likes a (space) bully
PRESENT because I’m out of the loop
> 8158 D Margaux, G. 3.0 The Duumvirate v.1.2
Huh. Aris listed this as 1.0 AI below, which means it wouldn’t work (was that
intentional? If so, that’s very clever)
> 8159 G. 3.0 Temporary Deputies
FOR
> 8160 D Margaux 1.0 Justice Favour Adjustments
FOR
> 8161 Trigon, Ørjan 3.0 Extend "amend" and “reenact”
AGAINST, because “A repealed rule not in the ruleset identified by its most
recent rule number MUST be specified for reenactment” could be interpreted as
imposing an obligation to reenact rules. (Why have an office to randomly
reenact ONE rule when we can make EVERYONE reenact EVERY rule?)
>
> 8162 Telnaior, G. 2.0 No Contract Reporting Rewards
AGAINST (apparently it’s broken)
> 8163 twg 3.0 Holey Loops, Batman!
FOR
>
> The proposal pool is currently empty.
>
> The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below.
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8152
> Title: Justice Reenactment
> Adoption index: 2.0
> Author: G.
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Re-enact Rule 2246 (name at repeal: Submitting a CFJ to the Justiciar),
> at Power-2, and the following text:
>
> When a person initiates a Call for Judgement, e CAN, optionally,
> submit it to the Referee by announcement. All persons are
> ENCOURAGED to submit a case to the Referee only when there is a
> good reason not to let it be processed by the Arbitor as usual.
>
> When a CFJ is submitted to the Referee, the Referee receives all
> obligations and powers for the specific case that the Arbitor
> would otherwise receive due to being Arbitor. This takes
> precedence over Rules that would otherwise assign duties and
> powers regarding a judicial case to the Arbitor.
>
>
> Retitle Rule 2246 to "Submitting a CFJ to the Referee".
>
>
>
> [
> History of R2246:
> Created by Proposal 6181 (comex), 7 April 2009
> Amended(1) by Proposal 6333 (coppro), 29 May 2009
> Amended(2) by Proposal 6496 (coppro), 26 September 2009
> Amended(3) by Proposal 6662 (Murphy; disi.), 10 March 2010
> Amended(4) by Proposal 6752 (Murphy), 2 August 2010
> Amended(5) by Proposal 6891 (coppro), 20 November 2010
> Repealed by Proposal 6961 '52-pickup v2' (G.), 3 March 2011
> ]
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8153
> Title: Favour Loophole Closure
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: D Margaux
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Amend Rule 2542 to replace:
>
> “The following officers CAN by announcement award Favours in the listed
> Parties, but SHALL NOT do so except as required by rule.”
>
> With:
>
> “The following officers CAN by announcement award Favours in the listed
> Parties only to the extent required by rule.”
>
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8154
> Title: [Seductive yodeling noises]
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: CuddleBeam
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Change "Any player whose Fame is either 10 or -10 CAN win the game With 2 Days
> Notice." to "Any player whose Fame is either 10 or -10 CAN Become One With
> The Cosmos With 2 Days Notice
>
> When a player Becomes One With The Cosmos, if their Fame is either 10 or
> -10, their Fame is set to 0 and they win the game."
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8155
> Title: Spaaace Loophole #493
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: twg
> Co-authors: Telnaior
>
>
> Amend Rule 2591, "Spaceships", by changing the text "Armour (an
> integer switch limited to values from 0 to 10 inclusive)" to "Armour
> (an integer switch limited to values less than or equal to 10)" and
> by changing the text 'A Spaceship with an Armour of 0 is "Defeated"'
> to 'A Spaceship with an Armour of 0 or less is "Defeated"'.
>
> [There are other ways to patch this, but I feel this is more elegant.
> If anybody else prefers a different solution, feel free to propose
> it.]
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8156
> Title: version ∞
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Trigon
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Amend Rule 2350 (Power=3) 'Proposals' by adding an item to the bulleted
> list:
>
> * A version, which SHOULD only be used when a proposal has been
> retracted and another proposal has been created with a similar
> purpose.
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8157
> Title: No one likes a (space) bully
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: Trigon
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Amend the paragraph beginning "A Space Battle CANNOT be initiated" in
> Rule 2593 (Power=1) 'Space Battles' by removing the final period and
> adding the following: "or if the prior Space Battle the spaceship
> initiating the Space Battle has been in was against the spaceship it is
> attacking."
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8158
> Title: The Duumvirate v.1.2
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: D Margaux
> Co-authors: G.
>
>
> Enact a power 3 rule entitled "The Duumvirate" with the following text:
>
> {
> The Duumvirate is an organization whose members are D. Margaux and G.
> Each member of the Duumvirate is a "Dictator."
>
> Either Dictator CAN by announcement cause this Rule to repeal itself.
>
> No person can act on behalf of a Dictator (other than the Dictator acting as
> emself).
>
> A Decree is a document clearly labeled as such. Either Dictator CAN proclaim a
> Decree with support from the other Dictator.
>
> When a Decree is proclaimed, then:
>
> (1) its power is set to 3;
>
> (2) it takes effect by applying to the gamestate the changes specified
> in the text of the Decree, to the greatest extent permitted by the
> rules; and then,
>
> (3) its power is set to 0.
> }
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8159
> Title: Temporary Deputies
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: G.
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Amend Rule 2160 (Deputisation) by replacing:
> 5. the deputy, when performing the action, announces that e is
> doing so by deputisation.
> with:
> 5. the deputy, when performing the action, announces that e is
> doing so by deputisation or by temporary deputisation.
>
> and by replacing:
> When a player deputises for an elected office, e becomes the
> holder of that office, unless the action being performed would
> already install someone into that office.
> with:
> When a player deputises for an elected office, e becomes the
> holder of that office, unless the action being performed would
> already install someone into that office, and/or unless the
> deputisation is temporary.
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8160
> Title: Justice Favour Adjustments
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: D Margaux
> Co-authors:
>
>
> [[Comment: This proposal fixes a mistaken reference to “cards,” requires the
> Referee to act in a timely fashion, and increases the reward to encourage a
> little more finger pointing, which I find to be an entertaining part of the
> game.]]
>
> Amend Rule 2542 to replace:
>
> {When a player's Finger-Pointing leads to a Card award, or when the Referee
> issues Summary Judgement, the Referee shall award a Favour in the Party
> holding Justice to the responsible player.}
>
> With:
> {When a player's Finger-Pointing results in a player being fined one or more
> blots, or when the Referee issues Summary Judgement, the Referee SHALL in a
> timely fashion award 2 Favours in the Party holding Justice to the
> responsible
> player.}
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8161
> Title: Extend "amend" and "reenact"
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Trigon
> Co-authors: Ørjan
>
>
> [ Comment: I stole Ørjan's wording for the third bullet point under
> reenactments and I got rid of all instances of "re-enact", opting for
> the nonhyphenated version. I also changed the title slightly. ]
>
> Amend Rule 105 (Power=3) 'Rule Changes' by removing items 3-6 in the
> ordered list and then adding to that list:
>
> 3. reenact a rule. A repealed rule not in the ruleset identified
> by its most recent rule number MUST be specified for
> reenactment. The rule's properties are to be set as follows:
>
> * its ID number will be the same as it was when the rule was
> most recently repealed.
>
> * its change identifier will be one more than its change
> identifier when it was most recently repealed.
>
> * Each of its text, power and title shall be as provided by the
> reenacting instrument, or if not provided, the same as when
> it was most recently repealed, with power defaulting to 1 if
> it had none. The rule SHOULD have materially the same purpose
> as did the repealed version.
>
> If the reenacting instrument is incapable of setting the
> reenacted rule's power to that value, then the reenactment is
> INEFFECTIVE.
>
> 4. amend a rule. This may include changing the rule's text, name,
> or power.
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8162
> Title: No Contract Reporting Rewards
> Adoption index: 2.0
> Author: Telnaior
> Co-authors: G.
>
>
> Add the following line to Rule 1006 ("Offices") after "If the holder of
> an office is ever not a player, it becomes vacant.":
>
> "Offices can only exist as long as they are defined by a rule."
>
> Amend the phrase "Publishing a duty-fulfilling report" in Rule 2496
> ("Rewards") to the following:
> "Publishing a report fulfilling the weekly or monthly duties of an office"
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8163
> Title: Holey Loops, Batman!
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: twg
> Co-authors:
>
>
> Amend Rule 1742, "Contracts", by inserting, between the fifth and
> sixth sentences of the first paragraph, the sentence "It is IMPOSSIBLE
> for a person to become a party to a contract without eir agreement."
>
> Amend Rule 2124, "Agoran Satisfaction", by changing each occurrence of
> "eligible entity" to "eligible entity, acting as emself,".
>
> Amend Rule 869, "How to Join and Leave Agora", by changing "A player
> CAN deregister" to "A player, acting as emself, CAN deregister".
>
> Amend Rule 2480, "Festivals", by changing the second paragraph to:
>
> If Agora's Festivity has had the same nonzero value for 14 days or
> more, or if it has a nonzero value and fewer than 5 players are
> Festive, then any player CAN flip it to 0 by announcement.
>
> Amend Rule 683, "Voting on Agoran Decisions", by changing "a player
> CAN by announcement withdraw (syn. retract) a ballot that e submitted"
> to "an entity CAN by announcement withdraw (syn. retract) a ballot
> that e submitted".
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
