This fails due to insufficient AI and power. -Aris
On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 11:30 AM Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the corrections, Ørjan. I submit the following proposal: > > ----- > Title: Extend "amend" and "reenact" > Author: Trigon > Co-authors: Ørjan > > [ Comment: I stole Ørjan's wording for the third bullet point under > reenactments and I got rid of all instances of "re-enact", opting for > the nonhyphenated version. I also changed the title slightly. ] > > Amend Rule 105 (Power=3) 'Rule Changes' by removing items 3-6 in the > ordered list and then adding to that list: > > 3. reenact a rule. A repealed rule not in the ruleset identified > by its most recent rule number MUST be specified for > reenactment. The rule's properties are to be set as follows: > > * its ID number will be the same as it was when the rule was > most recently repealed. > > * its change identifier will be one more than its change > identifier when it was most recently repealed. > > * Each of its text, power and title shall be as provided by the > reenacting instrument, or if not provided, the same as when > it was most recently repealed, with power defaulting to 1 if > it had none. The rule SHOULD have materially the same purpose > as did the repealed version. > > If the reenacting instrument is incapable of setting the > reenacted rule's power to that value, then the reenactment is > INEFFECTIVE. > > 4. amend a rule. This may include changing the rule's text, name, > or power. > > -- > Trigon
