Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8133-8138

[Kerim Aydin]

On Wed, 28 Nov 2018, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> 
> > Yeah, exactly, looks like that would work.  I might make it "explicitly"
> > permitted it the first sentence but that might be me being overcautious.
> 
> Still doesn't fix your worry about secrecy, though.

"By announcement" ensures the attempt-at-action has to be public, which is
what I was talking about earlier.  Whether the text of the contract is
discoverable, to determine whether an action was permitted by the contract, 
is something I'd be interested in exploring via the courts before 
legislating...