No, with this workflow all error correction is on the Assessor's end. This is, IMO, a good thing, because it provides more time for inconsequential typos introduced by the Promotor to be brought to light.
-Aris On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 3:56 PM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > On Sun, 25 Nov 2018, Aris Merchant wrote: > > > I hereby distribute each listed proposal... > > [...] > > > The proposal pool is currently empty. > > Random question: with this workflow, is there ever a self-ratification > that a proposal existed and was in the pool? (not that it matters too > much because the Assessor's voting report ratifies the whole process at > the end - though as a decision not as a proposal - I'm just curious). > > > >
