But just to clarify—if the CFJs find that G and i couldn’t transfer to the contract, then I think both of our votes (and our zombies’ votes) flip, causing the Point Installation Act to pass. Or is there some reason that wouldn’t occur in that situation?
> On Oct 2, 2018, at 2:33 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey <m...@timon.red> wrote: > > That reply was in response to D. Margaux's similar CoE, not yours. I properly > responded to your CoE by citing the appropriate CFJ. > > -twg > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >> On Tuesday, October 2, 2018 6:29 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: >>> >>> It's not a conditional vote, it's a conditional action to change >>> the vote. You still submitted an unconditional vote; it's just thatthe >>> content of your vote is, er, conditional on something else. >> >> How on earth do you come up with that reading? My message was: >> >>> I vote as follows [snip] >>> [...] >>> Conditional: If G. successfully transferred at least 1 coin to a >>> contract in this message, AGAINST, otherwise FOR. >> >> How is the "conditional" not clearly and obviously part of the vote >> (i.e. a conditional ballot)? > >
