Unfortunately this wouldn't converge the gamestate because, if these actions 
succeed, your location is now different to what it was before.

I don't believe they do succeed, though (and I see Trigon has made the same 
decision in eir Cartographor report just now), because even if the contract is 
invalid, D. Margaux has your reasonably implied consent to loot your 
facilities, so it's academic.

-twg


‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Sunday, September 30, 2018 10:06 PM, Corona <liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> TTTTPF
>
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 12:06 AM Corona liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > To converge the gamestate, I perform the following actions (all
> > INEFFECTIVE if I have successfully given everything to D. Margaux):
> > I spend 1 apple to move to (0, 2).
> > I spend 1 apple to move to (1, 2).
> > I spend 1 apple to move to (2, 2) and take all the assets from the
> > facility at that location.
> > I spend 1 apple to move to (2, 1) and take all the assets from the
> > facility at that location.
> > I spend 1 apple to move to (3, 1).
> > I spend 1 apple to move to (2, 1)
> > I spend 1 apple to move to (2, 0)
> > I spend 1 apple to move to (2, -1) and take all the assets from the
> > facility at that location.
> > I spend 2 apples to move to (2, -2) and take all the assets from the
> > facility at that location.
> > I spend 1 apple to move to (1, -2) and take all the assets from the
> > facility at that location.
> > I spend 1 apple to move to (0, -2)
> > I spend 1 apple to move to (0, -3).
> > I spend 1 apple to move to (0, -2)
> > I spend 1 apple to move to (0, -1)
> > I spend 1 apple to move to (-1, -1)
> > I spend 2 apples to move to (-2, -1).
> > I spend 2 apples to move to (-2, 0) and take all the assets from the
> > facility at that location.
> > I spend 1 apple to move to (-3, 0) and take all the assets from the
> > facility at that location.
> > I spend 1 apple to move to (-4, 0) and take all the assets from the
> > facility at that location.
> > I spend 1 apple to move to (-5, 0) and take all the assets from the
> > facility at that location.
> > I pay the following upkeep for the following facilities:
> > 7 (+2, +2) 2 Mine 2 lumber
> > A (+2, -1) 2 Mine 2 lumber
> > G (-3, 0) 2 Mine 2 lumber
> > 8 (+2, +1) 2 Orchard 2 stones
> > B (+2, -2) 2 Orchard 2 stones
> > F (-2, 0) 2 Orchard 2 stones
> > J (-4, 0) 3 Orchard 4 stones
> > K (-5, 0) 3 Orchard 4 stones
> > C (+1, -2) 2 Farm 1 lumber & 1 stone
> > I transfer all my liquid assets to D. Margaux
> > ~Corona
> > On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 1:41 AM D Margaux dmargaux...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > No idea if I got this all correct. But here goes.
> > > I spend 1 apple to move to (0, 2).
> > > I spend 1 apple to move to (1, 2).
> > > I spend 1 apple to move to (2, 2) and take all the assets from the
> > > facility at that location.
> > > I spend 1 apple to move to (2, 1) and take all the assets from the
> > > facility at that location.
> > > I spend 1 apple to move to (3, 1).
> > > I spend 1 apple to move to (2, 1)
> > > I spend 1 apple to move to (2, 0)
> > > I spend 1 apple to move to (2, -1) and take all the assets from the
> > > facility at that location.
> > > I spend 2 apples to move to (2, -2) and take all the assets from the
> > > facility at that location.
> > > I spend 1 apple to move to (1, -2) and take all the assets from the
> > > facility at that location.
> > > I spend 1 apple to move to (0, -2)
> > > I spend 1 apple to move to (0, -3).
> > > I spend 1 apple to move to (0, -2)
> > > I spend 1 apple to move to (0, -1)
> > > I spend 1 apple to move to (-1, -1)
> > > I spend 2 apples to move to (-2, -1).
> > > I spend 2 apples to move to (-2, 0) and take all the assets from the
> > > facility at that location.
> > > I spend 1 apple to move to (-3, 0) and take all the assets from the
> > > facility at that location.
> > > I spend 1 apple to move to (-4, 0) and take all the assets from the
> > > facility at that location.
> > > I spend 1 apple to move to (-5, 0) and take all the assets from the
> > > facility at that location.
> > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 8:34 AM D Margaux dmargaux...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > I pay 1 apple to move to (-1, 2). I pay 1 apple to move to (0, 2). I
> > > > take the coins at (0, 2).
> > > > [Comment: I am pretty confident that I can do this, even if the
> > > > initial transfer was
> > > > INEFFECTIVE, because I have Corona's implied consent]
> > > > If Corona has transferred these facilities to me, then I pay the
> > > > following upkeep
> > > > for the following facilities:
> > > > 6 ( 0, +2) Refinery 3 steel
> > > > 7 (+2, +2) 2 Mine 2 lumber
> > > > A (+2, -1) 2 Mine 2 lumber
> > > > G (-3, 0) 2 Mine 2 lumber
> > > > 8 (+2, +1) 2 Orchard 2 stones
> > > > B (+2, -2) 2 Orchard 2 stones
> > > > F (-2, 0) 2 Orchard 2 stones
> > > > J (-4, 0) 3 Orchard 4 stones
> > > > K (-5, 0) 3 Orchard 4 stones
> > > > C (+1, -2) 2 Farm 1 lumber & 1 stone
> > > > If Corona has not transferred those facilities to me, then I still pay
> > > > the upkeep
> > > > specified above if and only if those payments of upkeep are EFFECTIVE
> > > > to prevent the facilities from being destroyed.
> > > > [Comment: For example, maybe I can pay the upkeep by Corona's implied
> > > > consent--
> > > > but if my payments are not EFFECTIVE to prevent their destruction, then
> > > > I don't
> > > > want to spend the money. Am I doing this right..?]
> > > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 3:32 PM D Margaux dmargaux...@gmail.com
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I transfer 3 apples to nichdel.
> > > > > I cause nichdel to pay 1 apple to move to (0, 1), then 1 apple to
> > > > > move to (-1, 1), then 1 apple to move to (-2, 1).
> > > >
> > > > > I cause nichdel to take all the assets at (-2, 1).
> > > > > I pay the required upkeep for my rank 2 mine at (-2, 2) (I think 2
> > > > > lumber).
> > > >
> > > > > I take all the assets at (-2, 2).
> > > > > I high-five twg, who I think is still here at (-2, 2).
> > > > > I cause nichdel to transfer to me all eir liquid assets except not
> > > > > eir coins.
> > > >
> > > > > I spend 5 stones to build an orchard at (-3, 1) (the parcel of land I
> > > > > stole by self-ratification).
> > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 10:41 AM D Margaux dmargaux...@gmail.com
> > > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > I cause nichdel to take the assets at (1, 1). (I think 24 stones and
> > > > > > 16 ore.)
> > > >
> > > > > > I cause nichdel to transfer all eir stones and ore to D Margaux.
> > > > > > On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 1:48 PM D Margaux dmargaux...@gmail.com
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > > Moves on behalf of nichdel:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ----------------------------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I cause nichdel to pay 1 apple to move to (0, 1).
> > > > > > > I cause nichdel to pay 1 apple to move to (-1, 1).
> > > > > > > I cause nichdel to pay 1 apple to move to (-2, 1).
> > > > > > > I cause nichdel pay 3 apples to stake a land claim to (-3, 1) with
> > > > > > > land type Black.
> > > > > > > I cause nichdel to transfer the land at (-3, 1) to D. Margaux.
> > > > > > > I cause nichdel to pay 1 apple to move to (-2, 1).
> > > > > > > I cause nichdel to pay 1 apple to move to (-1, 1).
> > > > > > > I cause nichdel to pay 1 apple to move to (0, 1).
> > > > > > > I cause nichdel to pay 1 apple to move to (1, 1).
> > > > > > > I cause nichdel to transfer all transferable assets in eir
> > > > > > > possession
> > > >
> > > > > > > to D. Margaux. (I think that's 10 apples, 5 steel, & 8 paper.)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Moves on behalf of myself:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ---------------------------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I take the assets from the mine at (-2, 2). (I think that's 3
> > > > > > > stones & 2 ore.)
> > > >
> > > > > > > I pay 3 steel and 2 lumber to upgrade the mine at (-2, 2) to rank 
> > > > > > > 2.
> > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 4:04 PM D Margaux dmargaux...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > > > I pay 3 apples to Stake a Land Claim to (-2, 2) with land type
> > > > > > > > Black.
> > > >
> > > > > > > > I pay 5 lumber to build a mine on (-2, 2).
> > > > > > > > i intend without objection to declare ap-
> > > > > > > > athy specifying d margaux
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 5:35 PM D Margaux dmargaux...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > I pay an apple to move to (0, 1)
> > > > > > > > > I pay an apple to move to (-1, 1)
> > > > > > > > > I take all the assets located at (-1, 1).
> > > > > > > > > I pay 3 apples to Stake a Claim to (-2, 1) with land type 
> > > > > > > > > Black.
> > > > > > > > > I pay 3 lumber and 4 stones build a farm on (-2, 1).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > D. Margaux
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > D. Margaux
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > D. Margaux


Reply via email to