R2464, "Tournaments": "If a winner of a tournament is determined within within 3 months of its initiation, that person or persons win the game, otherwise the tournament concludes with no winner."
Who do you think wrote the latest version of the tournament rules. :) -Aris On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:55 AM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think that you get a win from the Birthday Tournament under > the current rules. > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 2:52 PM Aris Merchant > <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I agree about the short times as well. Sorry everyone. Now we just have > to > > see who wins on points... > > > > If I would be appointed Speaker, I request that the appointment be > deferred > > until after the PM election. > > > > -Aris > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 9:42 AM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Yah sorry about that, the first draft regs used original FRC timing > which > > > seemed far too long - holiday tournaments have sometimes worked best > > > as blitz versions but this was too short, somewhere in the middle would > > > have been best. > > > > > > On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, Rebecca wrote: > > > > damn time limits!!!!!! this would have been more fun with higher > > > > participation/longer time but congrats aris. > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:05 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > > > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Yes. That is my third strike. Now, Aris is the only remaining > player, > > > > > assuming eir argument is ruled VALID and e thus wins. > > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 8:59 AM Corona < > liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > [...] with which Agora would establish relations. > > > > >> > > > > >> You mean G.A.N. Agora? > > > > >> > > > > >> ~Corona > > > > >> > > > > >> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > > > > >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > I submit the below argument on the third docket: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Your Honor, > > > > >> > > > > > >> > I agree with My Fellow Counsellor, Aris, that the office of > > > Ambassador > > > > >> > should be brought back. However, there remain many qvestion$ to > > > > >> > consider, even after making that determination. Initially, it > must > > > be > > > > >> > determined whether a separate Ambassador should be appointed for > > > each > > > > >> > Nomic, with which Agora would establish relations. I believe > that it > > > > >> > would be better to have a separate Ambassador for each Nomic, so > > > that > > > > >> > each Ambassador would have a better knowledge of the foreign > Nomic. > > > > >> > Additionally, I would propose that there be a Minister of > Foreign > > > > >> > Affairs, who would determine general policy and serve as the > > > > >> > Ambassador to G.A.N. of F.R.C., in recognition of its special > > > historic > > > > >> > status, discussed on the first docket. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > From V.J. Rada > > > > > > > > > > >
