Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Referee] Summary Judgement

[Publius Scribonius Scholasticus]

It's fine, I just wanted to remind you of it for the future.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 6:32 AM Rebecca <edwardostra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Oops. That's not a mandate and there's no retracting fines, but
> acknowledged, and I apologize. I thought it was only Christmas.
>
> There is a rule that says that fines are not effective if the
> punishment imposed is manifestly inappropriate but that's only for the
> value of the fine, so there's no challenging these fines in court, but
> to be equitable, I suppose some remedy could be found where I write
> your apologies for you or something.
>
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 8:18 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> <p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Please note Rule 1769 and the fact that it applies to all of these 
> > violations.
> > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 4:09 AM Rebecca <edwardostra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> There is one person recently late on reports (myself) and three people
> >> very late on CFJs. One of them is Gaelan, a zombie, but the other two
> >> are PSS and ATMunn, who have no excuse. Those CFJs were assigned on 24
> >> June, and therefore became late on the 2nd of July. As today is just
> >> within the 14-day deadline for that time, I impose Summary Judgement
> >> on them. (By the way, Murphy emself has a SHALL obligation that e has
> >> missed to reassign these but I regard that as less important.
> >>
> >> I impose summary judgement on
> >> -Myself for not lodging a Referee Weekly Report last week
> >> -PSS for failing to judge the CFJ numbered 3645
> >> -ATMunn for failing to judge CFJ 3648
> >>
> >> The penalties I levy are as follows
> >> -I levy a 1-blot fine on myself, varying down from the Class-2 default
> >> because the conduct was unintentional and there was no new information
> >> to report. I designate this fine as forgivable and I designate the
> >> apology word "is".
> >> -I levy a 1-blot fine on PSS. I find that failing to judge a CFJ,
> >> which does not have a Class attached, is generally deserving of the
> >> lowest possible fine. I designate this fine as forgivable with the
> >> apology word "I".
> >> -I levy a 1-blot forgivable fine with the word "did" on ATMunn for the
> >> same reasons as above.
> >>
> >> --
> >> From V.J. Rada
>
>
>
> --
> From V.J. Rada