This isn't related to this rule in particular, but isn't addressing you "Your Honor" illegal, given #6: "The Right Honourable Judge G. SHALL be referred to as such"?
~Corona On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 5:57 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > appears VALID (again, formal response later). > > On Wed, 11 Jul 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > I present the following argument on the first docket to the court: > > > > Your Honor, My Fellow Counselor V.J. Rada seems to have made a fatal > > error in the presentation of eir reasons for Agora's eksallance. In > > eir argument, e stated that e would present six reasons. However, he > > proceeded to present five reasons. Your Honor, I do not believe that > > making such false statements before the court should be tolerated. > > > > Your Honor, while I concur with My Fellow Counselor Aris's objections > > to many of My Fellow Counselor V.J. Rada's reasons, I intend to argue > > that the arguments before the court are needless division. I believe > > that My Fellow Counselors V.J. Rada and Aris are engaging in a petty > > battle to divide the Great and Ancient Nomics when it would be most > > beneficial to all, if the Great and Ancient Nomics were to come > > together in cooperation to attempt to develop a better understanding > > of the theory and practice of Nomic and develop a larger following to > > address the problems that My Fellow Counselor Aris noted, regarding > > the lack of dedication within the playerbase of the Great and Ancient > > Nomic of Agora. To this end, I propose that a Joint Commissions on the > > Shared Interests be formed to address those issues that affect the > > Great and Ancient Nomics, with representatives from all interested > > nomics. > > > >
