Me too, if I can find the time I'm going to make the proposal.

~Corona

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu>
wrote:

>
>
> Sorry, I replied to Discussion right after bidding closed to point them out
> clearly but it was under the very informative Subject Re:[Herald] Weekly
> Report or something.
>
> I'm now a complete convert of going to the hash-supported secret (or at
> least not time-rushed) bidding method.
>
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
> > Official decree from the Cartographor:
> > Please, in all future auctions, if you bid outside of the main thread, I
> > would really appreciate it if you contacted me privately, telling me the
> > auction number and bid amount. I'll include a memo similar to the one
> above
> > in each land auction announcement.
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018, 14:26 Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Really sorry, but the auction results are still incorrect.  I don't
> think
> > > you won any of the auctions.
> > >
> > > Yesterday, I first bid like this:
> > > > AUCTION 1: the land unit at (-6, -1)
> > > > If I am not the current highest bidder in this auction, I bid
> > > > 46 coins.
> > > >
> > > > AUCTION 2: the land unit at (-6, +1)
> > > > If I am not the current highest bidder in this auction, I bid
> > > > 46 coins.
> > > >
> > > > AUCTION 3: the land unit at (-6, -2)
> > > > If I am not the current highest bidder in this auction, I bid
> > > > 46 coins.
> > >
> > > Followed by:
> > > > I bid 66 Coins in the auction for the land unit at (-6, +1)
> > > > I bid 66 Coins in the auction for the land unit at (-6, +2)
> > > > I bid 66 Coins in the auction for the land unit at (+6, -1)
> > >
> > > I didn't specify the auction# on those last 3 bids, but the land units
> > > for those are bids on AUCTION 2, AUCTION 4, and AUCTION 5.
> > >
> > > So I think I win Auctions 1 and 3 for 46 coins, and auctions 2, 4, 5
> > > for 66 coins.  (with 2 bids in auction 2).
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 10 Jul 2018, Corona wrote:
> > > > *Gasp* handwriting can be legible??? I pay 38 coins to Agora for
> each of
> > > > these auctions where I'm the winner, for Agora to transfer to me the
> land
> > > > units that are the lots of these auctions.
> > > >
> > > > ~Corona
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 9:18 PM, Reuben Staley <
> reuben.sta...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I do not believe there is any defined precedent for incorrect
> auction
> > > > > resolution, so... here's the corrected version: G. wins 1-3 for 66
> > > coins
> > > > > each. Corona wins 4-5 for 38 coins each.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018, 11:44 Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Corona wins all the quoted auctions for 38 coins.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm out of town and have been therefore unable to use my computer
> > > for a
> > > > > > while. Therefore, this resolution was written up on a paper
> instead
> > > of
> > > > > > typed up in order to save me the headache of having to do mobile
> > > > > > formatting. Here it is:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://i.imgur.com/dJSh2OZ.jpg
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Don't CFJ this. Please.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jul 2, 2018, 12:53 Reuben Staley <
> reuben.sta...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > There are currently more public, unpreserved, non-aether land
> > > units in
> > > > > > > existence than I feel like counting. 5 land units of my choice
> are
> > > put
> > > > > > > up for auction.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > For the following 5 auctions, I am the announcer, Agora is the
> > > > > > > auctioneer, and the minimum bid is 1 coin, and the lots are as
> > > such:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > AUCTION 1: the land unit at (-6, -1)
> > > > > > > AUCTION 2: the land unit at (-6, +1)
> > > > > > > AUCTION 3: the land unit at (-6, -2)
> > > > > > > AUCTION 4: the land unit at (-6, +2)
> > > > > > > AUCTION 5: the land unit at (+6, -1)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Trigon
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to