Could the points also be given to coauthors, in addition to authors? On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 10:33 AM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > Proto-proposal for a simple game to replace land (perhaps temporarily) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Oldschool Ordinals (Points!) with Zombies (OOPZ) v0.1 > (or, an "economy" in 2 rules). > > // Comment lines are marked like this. > // Points come and go - they've been gone for quite a while this > // time around. Seems like a nice place to go (if land is to be > // replaced, better to repeal and start fresh and do something simple > // in the mean time so there's no time pressure for drafting). > > > // The object of the game > > Amend Rule 2483 (Economics) to read in full: > > Points are the defined, official currency of Agora. Points can > only be owned by Players and Agora. Points are tracked by the > Treasuror. > > A player CAN win the game for a fee of 1,000 points. > > > // The buy-in > > For each player, a number of Points are created in eir possession equal > to either (A) the number of coins e had immediately before this proposal > took effect, or (B) 1,200, whichever is less. > > // The buy-in retroactively provides an finite endpoint for the current > // PAotM: get all the coins you can (up to 1,200). Will someone start > // this game with enough points to win and get partway to the next win? > // Quite likely. But that's a deserved buyout for playing PAotM. > > > // The method > > // Back to basics: Proposal = points. Since proposals are free to > // propose, that's your seed income - encourages proposal-based > // participation and no minimum income needed. > > Create the following Rule, Earning Points, AI-1.5: > > For a player 'earn' a point is for it to be created in eir > possession. For a player to 'lose' a point is for it to be > destroyed (if e has one). Earning and losing points is secured. > > When a decision to adopt a proposal is resolved: > > - If the outcome was ADOPTED, its author earns a number of points > equal to (the total strength of all valid ballots cast FOR the > decision - the total strength of all valid ballots cast AGAINST) > times the adoption index of the decision (final result rounded > up). > > - If the outcome was REJECTED, its author loses a number of points > equal to (the total strength of all valid ballots cast AGAINST > the decision - the total strength of all valid ballots cast FOR). > > - If the outcome was FAILED QUORUM, every active player who didn't > cast a ballot loses 1 point. > > At the start of each month, for each office, if a single player > held that office for 16 or more days in the previous month and no > unforgivable fines were levied on em for eir conduct in that > office during that time, that player earns 10 points. > > When a player registers who has not been a player at any time in > the past 30 days, e earns 25 points. > > When a zombie becomes active, e earns 25 points. > > > // Keep Zombies because individual votes are now worth something > // (can generate small amounts of points with their vote). > > // TODO > // Repeal Land. But this is COMPLETELY compatible with land - someone > // can re-enact Land wholesale when a draft is written and points won't > // get in the way. > > // TODO > // Make sure Pending is free, and blots are expungable by time. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >
DIS: Re: BUS: back to basics - this time with zombies
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus Mon, 09 Jul 2018 07:48:02 -0700
- DIS: Re: BUS: back to basics - this time w... Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
- DIS: Re: BUS: back to basics - this t... Aris Merchant
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: back to basics ... Aris Merchant
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: back to bas... Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: back to basics ... Edward Murphy
- DIS: Re: BUS: back to basics - this t... Timon Walshe-Grey
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: back to basics ... Kerim Aydin