On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 10:44 AM Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Aris wrote: > > > CFJ: The Herald may amend the tournament regulations without objection. > > > CFJ: At least one Agoran regulation exists. > > I favor these cases. > > Aside to Aris: > > Remember when I wrote the following, about a month ago? > > > Before reading, and with advanced appreciaton for the work, after > > last year I'm not voting for ANY change in the regulations rule before > > the 25th Birthday Tournament is well and dusted. > > > > Hopefully over-caution on my part but forgive that I hope. > > Your Regulations messed up the tournament last year, weren't used at > all for a year, and you suddenly had to repeal them right then, > couldn't wait a few weeks despite expressed and realistic misgivings. > And here we are. (read smiley of "I told you so amusement" not great > drama/upsetness here, pls). > > At the same time, you're campaigning that there's a great rush and > you're the one to save us from the current "crisis" which isn't really > a crisis as much as stalled and tweakable gameplay... lordy, no votes > on that from me, that's for sure. :P Yep. I really, really didn't see this one coming. I mean, I'd specifically checked that the regulations rule was compatible with anything written before. It didn't occur to me that another rule might reference the Regkeepor rule, so I never checked. Your point about my impatience is quite valid. -Aris > >
