Fair enough.  Personally, I don't believe that use of a contract implies
intent to become a party unless the contract says it does (specifically
in an Agoran context with a strong anti-mousetrap body of case law), but
I suppose it can be made explicit in the contract so as to not test that
question.

On Mon, 2 Jul 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Sure it does. "Anyone can act on my behalf to do X." implies that anyone
> who does consents to join the contract. There's no by announcement
> requirement for joining anymore, so it can be implied, and I think the
> implication is pretty clear in this such cases. Ordinary contract law
> allows someone to agree in advance to a contract with all interested
> comers, and I don't know why we'd make an exception here.
> 
> -Aris
> 
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 10:57 AM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > Except:  the new contract rule doesn't allow a person, for example, to
> > say "anyone CAN act on behalf of me to do X" because contracts require
> > two parties.  It would be good to have a mechanism by which a single
> > person could set up an act-on-behalf.  This was also an annoyance when
> > I was trying to set up the tournament.
> >
> > On Mon, 2 Jul 2018, Rebecca wrote:
> > > Should be untracked as they used to be, with the onus on players.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 3:06 PM, Aris Merchant
> > > <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 10:03 PM Edward Murphy <emurph...@zoho.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> V.J. Rada wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > This is a Notary weekly report.
> > > >>
> > > >> Notary was repealed by Proposal 8054.
> > > >>
> > > >> And pledges still reference it, don't they? We need to patch that.
> > There
> > > > are three options: 1. Make pledges into a kind of contract; 2. Make
> > them
> > > > untracked; and 3. Give the tracking responsibility for pledges back to
> > the
> > > > Referee. I'd tend to lean towards the first one, but what do others
> > think?
> > > >
> > > > -Aris
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > From V.J. Rada
> > >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to