This what happens when you let new players (i.e. me) make proposals
without checking them that much. lol.
On 6/11/2018 1:19 AM, Corona wrote:
Sure.
I award FAILED QUORUM a Medal of Honour for May 2018. Wear it proudly,
FAILED QUORUM!
~Corona
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 11:10 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]>
wrote:
However, by ais523's logic, from the previous Decision you're supposed
to award a Medal to FAILED QUORUM...?
On Sun, 10 Jun 2018, Corona wrote:
Ah, nevermind then.
~Corona
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 10:52 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]>
wrote:
No, the whole thing just fails I'm afraid (Rule 2529/3):
In the second Eastman week of an Agoran month, if there are any
players who are eligible for a Medal of Honour, the Herald CAN,
by
announcement, initiate an Agoran Decision on who is to be
awarded
a Medal of Honour.
If there's no eligible players, there's no CAN for initiation.
On Sun, 10 Jun 2018, Alex Smith wrote:
On Sun, 2018-06-10 at 22:26 +0200, Corona wrote:
I initiate an Agoran Decision on who is to be awarded a Medal of
Honour for June 2018. For this decision, the valid options are {}.
The vote collector is the Herald, and the voting method is instant-
runoff.
Quorum is 6.
Huh, some fun rulesey stuff going on here. As far as I can tell, it's
impossible to meaningfully vote on this, but it cannot fail quorum;
rather, at the end of the voting period (which the Herald SHALL end
early, and CAN do so by resolving it in the same message) it ends
with
a null outcome. The outcome of the vote is then awarded a Medal of
Honour. Again as far as I can tell, there's nothing restricting what
sort of entity can own a Medal of Honour, so it looks like the Medal
owned by the null outcome is going to become a tracked part of the
Herald report.
Unfortunately, the rules don't allow for the null outcome to get a
win
if this happens six times, but I think we should give it an honorary
win by proposal if the situation ever comes up.
--
ais523
